|
| Home | Quebec
| Fairmont The Queen Elizabeth |
Fairmont The Queen Elizabeth in Montreal, Quebec |
|
|
Fairmont The Queen Elizabeth
900 Rene-levesque Blvd W
Montreal, Quebec H3B4A5
Call Expedia at: 1-800-551-2409
|
| |
|
Fairmont The Queen Elizabeth Reviews
| Traveler Ratings Summary for Fairmont The Queen Elizabeth
|
Overall: 3.89 |
Service
4.05 |
Condition
3.95 |
Cleanliness
4.16 |
Comfort
3.68 |
Recommend
78.95 % |
|
| Great central location |
Overall: 4 |
Service
4 |
Condition
3 |
Cleanliness
4 |
Comfort
4 |
Recommend
Yes |
| Hotel is very central and comfortable. The spa is good and reasonably priced
Reviewed by traveler from Dallas TX on June 21, 2006 |
| Would go back |
Overall: 4 |
Service
5 |
Condition
4 |
Cleanliness
4 |
Comfort
3 |
Recommend
Yes |
| The Queen Elizabeth is a name that has always been associated with quality in Montreal. The Fairmont room that I was in was clean and comfortable, but small. Not much extra room here. one has to think where to place their personal items. Same goes for the bathroom. Don't look for any extra amenities such as bottled water ($8.50 for a bottle of Evian). The walls did not seem to be sufficiently sound proof. On the positive side, the healthclub was spacious and well equiped,which was a pleasant surprize. Overall a pleasant experience, but I am not altogether certain if the hotel nowadays lives up to its past reputation.
Reviewed by traveler from Orange CA on May 24, 2006 |
| Great location |
Overall: 5 |
Service
5 |
Condition
5 |
Cleanliness
4 |
Comfort
3 |
Recommend
Yes |
| I loved the location of this hotel. Its connection to the underground network was ideal. The coffee store, Second Cup, (underground) is so close I could get delicious coffee each morning. I could walk to Old Montreal in 15 minutes and to Sherbrook St and the museums in the same time or less. The room was fine and the lobby was also fine - nothing too elaborate.
Reviewed by traveler from Washington, D.C. on May 24, 2006 |
| Party central |
Overall: 2 |
Service
3 |
Condition
3 |
Cleanliness
4 |
Comfort
2 |
Recommend
No |
| I should have believed earlier reviews about the noisy nature of this hotel. I was wakened at 4:00 a.m. on a Thurdsay night by revelers next door and the walls were very thin.
Reviewed by traveler on May 3, 2006 |
| The wors experience! |
Overall: 1 |
Service
1 |
Condition
1 |
Cleanliness
1 |
Comfort
1 |
Recommend
No |
| the room was tiny although we paid for the "spacious" one. There were holes in the walls: some patched up with some gross yellow substance, some left "untreated". The bathroom was dirty and there were staines on the shower ceiling that resembled blood. I could swear that there were bed bugs in my bad. I was moved for the second night to te room that I have actuaaly paid for - after several complaints. This hotel was a nightmare!
Reviewed by traveler from Deerfield,NH on May 3, 2006 |
| Had a great time! |
Overall: 5 |
Service
5 |
Condition
4 |
Cleanliness
5 |
Comfort
4 |
Recommend
Yes |
| The hotel was very nice. It had a underground tunnel that connected to a mall, train station and metro (subway). You can go down there in cold weather with no coat on and walk, shop and eat etc... for hours. The pool was nice a little cold for my taste, but the whirlpool was great. The rooms where nice, clean with a great view. They where a little small but we managed. The Biodome was nice to visit and you can take the metro right to it. That was great because driving is crazy there. All in all it was a nice trip.
Reviewed by traveler from Syracuse New York on April 13, 2006 |
| Can't wait to go back |
Overall: 4 |
Service
5 |
Condition
4 |
Cleanliness
4 |
Comfort
4 |
Recommend
Yes |
| The Fairmont Queen Elizabeth was centrally located, the food was good, the rooms comfortable and the service excellent.
Reviewed by traveler from Chicago on March 8, 2006 |
| Very disappointing |
Overall: 1 |
Service
1 |
Condition
4 |
Cleanliness
4 |
Comfort
3 |
Recommend
No |
| Our stay at the Queen Elizabeth was definitely disppointing. I expect much better customer service from a hotle of this caliber. Our room was on a non-smoking floor, yet the guests in the room next door smoked heavliy throughout our stay. After several complaints, the hotel still refused to enforce their no-smoking policy in non-smoking rooms.
Reviewed by traveler from Tampa, FL on October 16, 2005 |
| Can't wait to go back. |
Overall: 5 |
Service
5 |
Condition
5 |
Cleanliness
5 |
Comfort
5 |
Recommend
Yes |
| The hotel is very conveniently located for shopping and public transportation. The staff, especially in the restaurant, are very curteous, helpful and interested in making one's visit pleasant and memorable. The hotel is a very classy place.
Reviewed by traveler from Carson City, NV on July 21, 2005 |
| Nice Montreal hotel |
Overall: 5 |
Service
4 |
Condition
5 |
Cleanliness
5 |
Comfort
5 |
Recommend
Yes |
| Only knock is that the rooms are small but otherwise nice view of the cathedral nxt door, good decor. Food in the resturant was excellent. Nice location, easy walk to all sights and museums.
Reviewed by traveler from New Rochelle, NY on May 11, 2005 |
| too cold in the room |
Overall: 4 |
Service
5 |
Condition
4 |
Cleanliness
4 |
Comfort
4 |
Recommend
Yes |
| At night, the rooms were too cold. Heater made some noise and unable to sleep well. Otherwise, the hotel was very good.
Reviewed by traveler from Boston, MA on May 10, 2005 |
| Great for kids |
Overall: 5 |
Service
5 |
Condition
5 |
Cleanliness
5 |
Comfort
5 |
Recommend
Yes |
| Everyone was great with our son. We had a pack and play provided to us for a crib with a sheet, they had real high chairs in the restaurant and the waitress even offered to keep an eye on the baby so my husband could use the buffett when I was at my meeting...
Reviewed by traveler from Cincinnati, OH on April 28, 2005 |
| Expected more. |
Overall: 4 |
Service
3 |
Condition
5 |
Cleanliness
5 |
Comfort
4 |
Recommend
No |
| The hotel was clean. The decor was outdated, especially in the lobby. We had a nice view from the room (cathedral). We checked in at 11:00am. They were unable to give me reservations at their nicest restaurant. Apparently it was going to be closed that day even though they were suppose to be open. No real explanation. I tried to exchange american money for canadian money and they said I'd find a better exchange rate somewhere else. Turns out they were wrong. During the stay, a hotel employee came into our room with us there and inspected the minibar for missing items. Shouldn't they do that after our stay?? Overall the staff was terrible, but the hotel was relatively nice and clean with a good location.
Reviewed by traveler on January 13, 2005 |
| Wonderful |
Overall: 5 |
Service
5 |
Condition
5 |
Cleanliness
5 |
Comfort
5 |
Recommend
Yes |
| High class, great service, excellent experience all around. I will certainly stay at the QE again.
Reviewed by traveler on January 12, 2005 |
| Ideal choice |
Overall: 5 |
Service
5 |
Condition
5 |
Cleanliness
5 |
Comfort
5 |
Recommend
Yes |
| The hotel is very well situated, within walking distance of the best shopping streets. Concierge and doormen are extremely helpful in making plans and connections.We stayed four days and are happy to recommend this hotel for other travelers, particularly those traveling by train.People in Montreal could not have been nicer to us.We had a wonderful time in a charming and interesting city.
Reviewed by traveler from New Jersey on December 9, 2004 |
| If you arrive by train, stay here. |
Overall: 5 |
Service
5 |
Condition
5 |
Cleanliness
5 |
Comfort
5 |
Recommend
Yes |
| We arrived in Montreal by VIA Rail. We stayed in the Queen Eliazabeth because we never had to go outside. We could shop the underground that connects to the train station. We could walk to our hotel inside the building. It was extremely convenient.
Reviewed by traveler from Indiana on November 7, 2004 |
Didn't find the Hotel you are looking for?
Go to our Hotel section to get started booking your trip today. |
|
